Key Rating Drivers & Detailed Description
Strengths:
- Strong capitalisation, with healthy cover for asset-side risks
Capitalisation is marked by sizeable networth of Rs 16,302 crore as on December 31, 2020, supported by healthy internal accruals. Networth coverage for pro-forma net NPAs was also comfortable at around 13 times. Consolidated Tier-1 capital adequacy ratio (CAR) was healthy at 23.7% as on December 31, 2020, as was total CAR at 30.5%. Consolidated on-book gearing was comfortable at 4.0 times as on December 31, 2020 (4.9 times as on March 31, 2020). Given the strong liquidity that IBHFL maintains on a steady-state basis, net gearing was 3.3 times as on December 31, 2020.
The company has demonstrated strong ability to raise capital (including the Rs 683 crore equity raised through QIP in fiscal 2021) and the proposed capital raising will further strengthen the capital position over the medium term. CRISIL Ratings believes the company’s strong capitalisation will continue to support its overall financial risk profile over the medium term.
- Comfortable asset quality in retail segments
IBHFL reported gross NPA of 1.75% as on December 31, 2020 compared to 1.84% as on March 31, 2020. Excluding the impact of the Supreme Court order on stay on NPA recognition, pro-forma gross NPA was at 2.44% as on December 31, 2020. Accelerated write-offs, primarily in the commercial credit portfolio, also supported the asset quality metrics during the current fiscal.
Asset quality has remained comfortable in the housing loan and LAP segments. The pro-forma gross NPA in housing loan and LAP segment was 1.1% and 2.0%, respectively, as on December 31, 2020. However, with a few high ticket slippages from the commercial credit book during fiscal 2020 and continued traction in refinancing of this portfolio resulting in de-growth, gross NPAs in this segment have increased to 10.2% as on December 31, 2020. However, this can be partly attributed to the management’s decision to proactively recognize some accounts in the commercial real estate book as NPAs due to reduction in collateral values even though they are not overdue by more than 90 days.
Furthermore, the company’s risk-mitigating measures are prudent, in the form of conservative loan-to-value ratios (averaging around 50%) in the LAP segment, and emphasis on collateral with sufficient cover in the commercial real estate segment. However, any sharp increase in NPAs, mainly in the commercial credit portfolio, and its impact on profitability will remain key rating sensitivity factors for IBHFL.
- Sizeable presence in the retail mortgage finance segment
IBHFL is the one of the larger housing finance companies (HFCs) in India with total AUM of Rs 86,566 crore as on December 31, 2020. The share of housing loans within the overall AUM continues to increase – the same has risen to 68% as on December 31, 2020, from 50% as on March 31, 2015. The company’s LAP portfolio accounted for 19% of the overall AUM as on December 31, 2020, with remaining 13% was towards commercial credit. Going forward, the proportion of housing loan and LAP is expected to increase further from current levels.
Given the challenging operating environment, overall AUM declined by 15% year-on-year as on December 31, 2020, on account of lower disbursements as well as higher prepayments/sell-down in commercial credit book. This is also because of the current business transition with more focus on a granular portfolio. The overall disbursements during the nine months of fiscal 2021 were Rs 9,177 crore, with pick up seen in the second and third quarters of fiscal 2021 to around Rs 3,500 crore each. IBHFL’s overall AUM growth is expected to be subdued over the next few quarters as it recalibrates its business model, but is expected to revive subsequently. While the share of own book in the total AUM is expected to come down, its overall presence in the retail mortgage finance market is expected to remain sizeable.
Weaknesses:
- Susceptibility to asset quality risks arising from the commercial real estate portfolio
Asset-quality risks arising from a sizeable large-ticket commercial credit portfolio of Rs 11,340 crore as on December 31, 2020 persist, and could impact the company’s portfolio performance. Given the chunkiness of loans (average ticket size of Rs 150 crore), even a few large accounts experiencing stress could impact asset quality.
Given the current macroeconomic environment, asset quality in segments such as commercial credit and LAP remain vulnerable and will be monitored closely, since the borrowers in these segments are more sensitive to an environment of prolonged liquidity tightness. However, RBIs measure on extension of date of commencement of commercial operations (DCCO) for commercial real estate projects and one-time debt restructuring should provide some respite.
IBHFL has restructured ~7% of commercial credit AUM and none of the projects has been given extension under DCCO.
Furthermore, the share of commercial credit in overall AUM has decreased over last couple of years and was 13% as on December 31, 2020. The management is also in discussion with a potential investor for launching an alternative investment fund (AIF) platform (expected to be launched in fiscal 2022) for this segment.
However, any weakening in asset quality, specifically in the commercial real estate book and its impact on profitability, remains a monitorable.
- Successful transition to new business model to be established; though IBHFL has demonstrated strong execution capabilities in the past
The management has recalibrated their business model in light of funding access challenges that the company, as well as non-banking financial companies (NBFCs) in general have faced in recent times. Under the revised business model IBHFL plans to move towards a less risky and asset-light framework, wherein disbursements will primarily be in the housing loans and LAP segments (with potentially 60:40 split), with a low proportion of incremental disbursals in developer finance portfolio. Furthermore, on a steady state basis, of the overall disbursals, a significant proportion will be either co-originated or sold-down to banks.
IBHFL has started working towards this new model and has entered into co-origination agreement with a few public sector banks and is also in advanced stages of discussion with few other banks. However, the management’s ability to increase the disbursement pace, establish tie-ups with multiple banks and successfully scale up this model, while maintaining healthy profitability and asset quality is to be witnessed, though the company has demonstrated good execution capabilities in scaling up businesses in the past.
While earnings are expected to decline from levels seen in recent years, it will be supported by income from co-origination, off-balance sheet portfolio, and from spread on sold down loans. Furthermore, this will be commensurate with the more granular, lower-risk portfolio which will be the focus as part of the new business model. In recent times, earnings were impacted on account of decline in AUM, as well as higher credit cost. Overall, IBHFL’s return on assets (RoA) decreased to 1.3% during fiscal 2020 and nine months ended December 31, 2020 from 1.9% for fiscal 2020.